The Greatest rgb led lighting

Are you looking for information regarding rgb led lighting? study the product critiques, we are going to tackle the unique aspects, fundamentals as well as other points of interest about rgb led lighting. Lots of readers discover that this website is a great spot to begin if you need to purchase the prodct about rgb led lighting.

We will supply detailed sources like critiques, images, articles, videos and links that may be of fantastic use in case you would like to make a additional detailed study about it.” in case you wish to acquire a lot more information about rgb led lighting. just see clearly as beneath.

Rating:
Reviews: customer reviews...
List Price: unavailable
Sale Price: Too low to display.
Availability: unspecified

Product Description

No description available.

Details

No features available.

There was an error connecting to the Amazon web service, or no results were found for your query.

You can in no way have a lot of information regarding such an considerable dilemma. Do you agree? Are you currently currently feeling far better informed regarding the alternatives you could have? When all around you take place to be scratching their heads, it really is a terrific feeling to have clear vision and know which direction you take place to be heading.

If the above write-up helped your understanding of %keywords% please pass around the word about our website. We would prefer to enable everybody get a higher understanding in the selections they have obtainable.

Mac@last!! asked How can I measure the response of a Cds photocell to change in wavelength?

I have a project and I want to plot a graph of the response (%) of a Cds photocell to change in wavelength(nm) of incident light(using the color spectrum). What can I do to measure this? I already have a circuit with an RGB led hooked up to an Arduino Uno, a Cds photocell, Arduino and Processing environment installed, and other simple instruments. Is it possible for me to use these things to carry out this experiment, and if so how? Any other method (e.g. using Physics lab instruments and machines) is also welcomed. Any help is greatly appreciated.

And got the following answer:

The lab approach would be to use a known light source with a known spectrum such as a xenon lamp, and a monochromator to filter out an adjustable narrow band of wavelengths. This amounts to an adjustable source of known wavelength and power. A refinement would be to use a detector with a known (flat) spectral response such as a radiometer to verify the output of the monochromator. Nevertheless light measurements like this are not usually very accurate in absolute terms, so you would not expect much better than 5% overall accuracy (if you were including sensitivity to power density, like watts per square meter). The accuracy of the relative spectral response in percent would be a little better because some of the errors are common to all wavelengths. Because of the foregoing, it is quite acceptable to use the published response for the spectral response, which would be found in a data sheet. If you wanted to use a collection of leds of different colours the issue is determining their relative output in terms of mW per steradian or mW per square meter. This would need a detector with a known spectral response and cross section, such as a radiometer. The output of the leds is usually specified in candela/steradian, which is a photopic measurement based on lumens not a radiometric measurement based on watts. This could be converted to watts/steradian as the leds have a narrow band of wavelengths and that is known from the data sheet for the led, but this is not relevant anyway because the output of the led is still unknown. This is because the specification is very broad. Beam width and surface area.. The detector has a constant surface area, so this just means the beam width of all the sources must cover the surface of the reference detector or the CdS cell under test. Then the sources are used at the same distance and facing square on to the sensor being used, with the same relative situation. If they need to be at different distances 1/d^2 can be used, but the accuracy probably suffers anyway. Thus 1.414 times the distance means 1/2 the power density in watts per square meter, or 1/1.414 times the distance is double the power density, assuming the beam still covers the detector properly. An issue with the led method is that leds have a very low power level, so it may be difficult to get a reading at all except at very close in distances. For this reason, consider the brightest leds (ultra bright types) driven with their maximum current, likely 20mA. Another issue is that the brightness of leds has a significant temperature coefficient which needs to be controlled. If the room temperature is constant, the led will eventually settle to a stable temperature after a few minutes. When comparing the brightness of several leads, assuming a flat reference sensor spectrum, get the relative readings in ratio or percent compared to the brightest led using the reference detector. Next correcting for the spectral response of the reference detector if any. This is then used with the reading using that led. For example if a led reads 90% of the brightest led, and then reads 0.47 with the CdS cell, multiply this reading by 1/0.9 (divide by 0.9) so the corrected result taking into account this led's reduced output is 0.47 / 0.9 = 0.52. Note that corrections are multiply or divide, not adding or subtracting. This test is difficult to perform unless you can get a suitable reference detector to provide calibrations of the leds. Solar instruments like pyranometers tend to be too insensitive for led measurements. You will find lux meters are more readily available. These measure in lux = lumens per m^2 so have the photopic spectral response. However it is not certain how accurate this spectral response is with cheaper lux meters. Better to find a suitable radiometer (flat spectral resonse, with sensitivity to suit leds) if possible. The fourth link shows a CdS cell data sheet, with the spectral response included. The last link has a table with the photopic response which might be useful. Try entering these values in a spreadsheet to perform corrections and plot the result. You might be able to devise a different experiment using a strong light source like the sun to determine the brightness range and sensitivity (cell resistance) of the sensor and whether it is linear. Look up step wedge for a way to make an attenuator.

There was an error connecting to the Amazon web service, or no results were found for your query.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.